Member Profile for cryptographrix • VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

cryptographrix

Member Profile

Member Since: 2007-02-01
Charter Subdomain: http://cryptographrix.videosift.com
Last Power Points used: never • Available: now
Max Power Points: 2 • Get More Power Points Now

Comments

Something is askew here, and it will probably remain that way until documents get declassified. I don't believe the story I was told. Fide Nominem.

In reply to this comment by cryptographrix:
rationally and scientifically? state your science, theo!

You were taught in high school that gravity pulls things to the ground at 9.8 meters per second squared, correct?

9.8 meters is equal to 32.152231 feet

So, from the first second of a fall in a vacuum(no air to produce friction against, according to Newtonian Physics), a ball would have been traveling at 32.152231 feet per second, per second

In the First second - 0-32.152231 feet down from origin - 32.152231 feet per second
In the Second second - 32.152231 - 96.456693 feet down from origin - 64.304462 feet per second
In the Third second - 96.456693 - 192.913386 feet down from origin - 96.456693 feet per second
In the Fourth Second - 192.913386 - 289.370079 feet down from origin - 128.608924 feet per second
In the Fifth Second - 289.370079 - 421.131234 feet down from origin - 160.761155 feet per second
In the Sixth Second - 421.131234 - 614.04462 feet down from origin - 192.913386 feet per second
In the Seventh Second - 614.04462 - 839.110237 feet down from origin - 225.065617 feet per second
In the Eighth Second - 839.110237 - 1096.325085 feet down from origin - 257.214848 feet per second
In the Ninth Second - 1096.325085 - 1385.692164 feet down from origin - 289.367079 feet per second
In the Tenth Second - 1385.692164 - 1707.211474 feet down from origin - 321.51931 feet per second
(Tallest of the towers was around 1370 feet tall...thus, I stop here.)

Working FORWARDS - equation of a fall, based on the gravity of Earth IN A VACUUM.

Suffice it to say, it should have taken at least a minute and a half for those towers to fall, just by friction of the steel alone(even ASSUMING that all of the floor connectors gave way at the EXACT SAME MOMENT).

If you want, I can send you the blueprints - STATE YOUR RATIONALE!

written by NordlichReiter

| 5 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

There are Ph.D.'s who are advocates for intelligent design, too - and their underlying belief systems override their better judgment, just like with you.

In reply to your comment:
“Some life - arguing/voting down others about subjects you don't know anything about.

If I'm a science "amateur," who do you consider to be professionals? Please note - I am a physicist.

My challenge stands. Newtonian physics is 10th grade level physics at best. If it'd take too much of your glorious "life" in order to complete my challenge, then maybe you should go back to high school.

As for your challenge, here is where I spend 75% of my time: http://xxx.lanl.gov

In reply to your comment:
“Sorry, dude - I try to have a life.
Here's a challenge for you:
Read something other than crap on 9/11 conspiracy websites from science amateurs like yourself.

In reply to your comment:
“Here's a challenge for you: Prove that the WTC COULD have collapsed using Newtonian physics and provide your dissertation.

Here is a very good Creative Commons book on Newtonian physics. Use this or any other book on Newtonian physics you know, and tell me how the towers could have collapsed in the time they did. Use any video or written documentation you choose as a record of the time those towers took to fall.
”””

written by theo47

| 1 year 5 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Sorry, dude - I try to have a life.
Here's a challenge for you:
Read something other than crap on 9/11 conspiracy websites from science amateurs like yourself.

In reply to your comment:
“Here's a challenge for you: Prove that the WTC COULD have collapsed using Newtonian physics and provide your dissertation.

Here is a very good Creative Commons book on Newtonian physics. Use this or any other book on Newtonian physics you know, and tell me how the towers could have collapsed in the time they did. Use any video or written documentation you choose as a record of the time those towers took to fall.
”

written by theo47

| 1 year 5 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

lol at "reasons to leave the US" playlist containing one item, "Lithuanian Honey Wrestling". So, i guess that playlist is complete now. Congratulations!

written by MINK

| 1 year 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I found an interesting post along the lines of earlier discussion "Who owns the Fed" http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_business&Number=295303911

Here are some points:
1. Banks indeed make profit from the Fed, but that profit is fixed and mandatory for every member bank (6% dividends paid on 3% of the capital), and accounts for about 0.5% of total bank revenue
2. Any extra profit that the Fed makes (for instance through interest payments on government bonds) is returned back to the government

written by yaroslavvb | 1 year 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

i tried posting this a while back, Money, Banking and the Federal reserve, documentary by the Mises institute exposing the farce of the Fed and fiat currency. But It died in the queue. Maybe you might want to post it again (with a catchier title?)
http://www.videosift.com/video/Money-Banking-and-the-Federal-Reserve

written by bizinichi